When news broke yesterday about Paul Ryan’s new comments about rape, I was just finishing a new post for the Independent Voter Network about the Todd Akin news cycle and what it showed us about media bias (and our own biases).
Wait. You didn’t hear about the new Paul Ryan rape comment? The one where he includes rape as a method of conception? Yeah, me neither.
What was that about the lessons we learned from the boondoggle that was the Rep. Todd Akin statements about “legitimate rape” last week? And the lessons learned about the media being lazy and well, fucking up (to paraphrase Akin’s own interviewer about falling down on the job). Here we go again. Watch the clip for yourself. It’s embedded in this Huffington Post piece, which has a headline that just says it all: Paul Ryan said something that should probably force him off the ticket, but you probably didn’t hear about it.
And lest I fall into the trap of the traditional media and fail to correct a false assertion blatantly told by Paul Ryan… Let’s set the record straight on rape.
While some rapes may result in conception, rape is not simply a method of conception. Rape is a criminal act. And it is a form of violence against an unwilling, non-consenting partner. (Here’s a guide on what rape is.) In fact, talking about rape in the way Ryan does actually puts it in conflict with Akin’s earlier assertion that the female body can shut down conceptions from rape. The way Ryan spins it, rape is just an item on the conception menu. Meanwhile, Akin’s comment eludes, however minutely, to the idea that a pregnancy resulting from rape would be undesirable (which is where a woman’s body shutting it down comes into play, I guess).
In my book, Ryan’s comments are worse than Akin’s by a long way. Putting rape in neutral terms — such as calling it a method of conception — has a nullifying effect on the criminal act you are talking about: Rape. People go, “Oh, conception is not bad so conceptions from rape must not be that bad.” This is a shell game. This is essentially a marketing campaign designed to desensitize you to the idea of rape and any resulting conceptions from rape. The endgame, of course, is that you vilify women who seek abortions after they are raped. Because why wouldn’t you want to keep your rape-baby, you evil slutty whore?
If Ryan, Akin and their ilk can’t get bogus terminology like “forcible rape” codified into law — putting a narrow definition on what rape is while simultaneously creating a greater onus on survivors who seek justice, medical attention, and any other service necessary to recover — then the next best tactic is to strip away any empathy the public might have for survivors of rape. After all, a tipping point even within the GOP is whether or not an exception should exist for rape/incest survivors in abortion bans. Those exceptions, which are fairly meaningless because they are almost impossible to qualify for, are what make some conservatives appealing. (And really, why is one reason to have an abortion more legitimate than another?) It makes them look compassionate, fair even. And we all know that’s a lie, too.
There is no softer side of rape, no matter how conservatives try to spin it. There is no “consensual rape.” No “legitimate” rape. There is just rape. Rape is bad. It is always bad. Period.
Then there is abortion. It exists. Love it. Hate it. Either way, it is legal and it is a form of health care. And women who get one deserve the same amount of privacy and respect as any other person making decisions about their health and medical care. It doesn’t matter the reason. It’s none of your damn business.
So let me break it down as simply as I can: Rape = Illegal; Abortion = Legal.
And to the media, with whom I feel especially aggrieved since I am still an adjunct member myself: Get your heads out of your fucking asses! Follow-up! Be diligent! Stop cowering because you are afraid someone is going to call you a liberal just for reporting facts! Do your job!
Update: Because I like it so much, I wanted to call out Desert Beacon‘s fine round-up of some of the recent ways the GOP has been horrible on the rape and abortion issue. (It’s actually quite disturbing when you see them all together like that.)
10 thoughts on “The Ryan method: Validating rape as form of conception”
Pingback: Crying About Rape | Desert Beacon
Pingback: The Sin City Siren 2.0? « The Sin City Siren
Pingback: Fear Factor: The cognitive dissonance of change and the Republicans who hate it « The Sin City Siren
Pingback: Rape on the Rez: The silent assault on Native American women « The Sin City Siren
Pingback: Debating ‘a bunch of malarkey’ « The Sin City Siren
Pingback: Obama wins! Ding-Dong the Election (Season) is Dead! « The Sin City Siren
Pingback: Obama Wins! Ding-Dong The Election (Season) Is Dead! | Fem2pt0
Pingback: Breaking the chains of misogyny that shackle us to rape culture « The Sin City Siren
Pingback: The Revolution will be Livestreamed? Occupy Steubenville casts a harsh light on our own Rape Culture « The Sin City Siren
Pingback: Fell on Black Days: The GOP’s old tricks stir the pot before midterms | The Sin City Siren